Application of Epidemiological Data for Decision Making: Health Claims
نویسنده
چکیده
The Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (NLEA), which amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in 1990, authorized the use of health claims that are based on significant scientific agreement in food labeling. In 1994, the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) defined dietary supplements and created a legal framework for use of claims that is similar to the regulation of foods. Health claims describe the relationship between a substance (food or food component) and reduction of the risk of a disease or health-related condition; they are not intended as claims to cure, treat, mitigate, or prevent disease, which are considered drug claims. Since the enactment of the NLEA, the FDA has developed a process to evaluate scientific evidence in support of health claims. In 1999, the FDA published Guidance for Industry: Significant Scientific Agreement in the Review of Health Claims for Conventional Foods and Dietary Supplements. As a result of a series of court cases, the agency developed a process for qualified health claims that characterizes the quality and strength of scientific evidence because these claims are not based on significant scientific agreement. Since 2003, the FDA has published several letters of enforcement discretion for qualified health claims that illustrate the agency’s approach to evaluating the scientific literature when the strength of the evidence is not consistent with significant scientific agreement. In 2007, the agency published the draft Guidance for Industry: Evidence-Based Review System for the Scientific Evaluation of Health Claims that further outlined the FDA’s approach to evaluating scientific evidence for health claims. In January 2009, the final guidance was posted and replaced the 1999 guidance document as well as the interim guidance related to qualified health claims. The final guidance specifically addresses the use of observational data in the evaluation of health claims and describes the criteria used by the agency in the evaluation of such data. A copy of the guidance can be found on the FDA Web site (http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/FoodLabelingNutrition/ ucm073332.htm). The guidance highlights some of the challenges that must be considered for the agency to use observational data to draw scientific conclusions on the relationship between a specific substance and disease or health-related condition for the health claim under review.
منابع مشابه
IDENTIFICATION OF REASONS FOR CLAIMS OF CONTRACTORS IN D-B-B CONTRACTS AND EVALUATION BY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING MODELS (AHP)
The increasing complexity of construction, along with its rapid development, as well as ambiguities and gaps in the legal terms governing constructions, lack of trust in the parties regarding obligations and regulations are the main reasons of disagreements in domestic projects. These disagreements are inevitable even in contracts which are set correctly. Disagreements are costly, time-consumin...
متن کاملApplication of Rough Set Theory in Data Mining for Decision Support Systems (DSSs)
Decision support systems (DSSs) are prevalent information systems for decision making in many competitive business environments. In a DSS, decision making process is intimately related to some factors which determine the quality of information systems and their related products. Traditional approaches to data analysis usually cannot be implemented in sophisticated Companies, where managers ne...
متن کاملRanking Network-Structured Decision-Making Units and Its Application in Bank Branches
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method used for measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Unlike the standard models, which assume decision-making units to be a black box, network data envelopment analysis focuses on the internal structure of these units. Some researchers have developed a two-stage method where all the inputs are entirely used in the first stage, producin...
متن کاملDecentralisation – A Portmanteau Concept That Promises Much but Fails to Deliver?; Comment on “Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis”
Decentralisation has been described as an empty concept that lacks clarity. Yet there is an enduring interest in the process of decentralisation within health systems and public services more generally. Many claims about the benefits of decentralisation are not supported by evidence. It may be useful as an organising framework for analysis of health systems but in this context it lacks conceptu...
متن کاملUse of Cost-Effectiveness Data in Priority Setting Decisions: Experiences from the National Guidelines for Heart Diseases in Sweden
Background The inclusion of cost-effectiveness data, as a basis for priority setting rankings, is a distinguishing feature in the formulation of the Swedish national guidelines. Guidelines are generated with the direct intent to influence health policy and support decisions about the efficient allocation of scarce healthcare resources. Certain medical conditions may be given higher priority ran...
متن کامل